No.17 2006

And you thought the water was dirty?

Safe shellfish: new regulations

Why children shouldn't play in duck ponds

How did the chicken get it?

Water resources outlook

Water resources review

In this issue

  • (no image provided)

    How did the chicken get it?

    This issue of Water Resources Update focuses on microbial pathogens. We highlight some surprising research findings and ongoing efforts to reduce faecal contamination of our waterways.
  • (no image provided)

    Why children shouldn't play in duck ponds

    This issue of Water Resources Update focuses on microbial pathogens. We highlight some surprising research findings and ongoing efforts to reduce faecal contamination of our waterways. – Jim Cooke, Centre Leader.
    Why children shouldn't play in duck ponds
    It may still surprise some people to learn that water is typically most contaminated in catchments with large numbers of birds, rather than farmed animals.
    That’s one finding of a ‘Pathogen Occurrence and Human Health Risk Assessment Analysis’ published by the health and environment ministries.
  • (no image provided)

    Water resources outlook

    This issue of Water Resources Update focuses on microbial pathogens. We highlight some surprising research findings and ongoing efforts to reduce faecal contamination of our waterways.
  • (no image provided)

    Water resources review

    This issue of Water Resources Update focuses on microbial pathogens. We highlight some surprising research findings and ongoing efforts to reduce faecal contamination of our waterways.
  • (no image provided)

    Safe shellfish: new regulations

    This issue of Water Resources Update focuses on microbial pathogens. We highlight some surprising research findings and ongoing efforts to reduce faecal contamination of our waterways.
  • (no image provided)

    And you thought the water was dirty?

    This issue of Water Resources Update focuses on microbial pathogens. We highlight some surprising research findings and ongoing efforts to reduce faecal contamination of our waterways. – Jim Cooke, Centre Leader.
    And you thought the water was dirty?
    The sediment in the bottom of a stream can contain up to 1000 times more faecal contamination than the water itself under baseflow conditions.